On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 07:26:17PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote: > Package: luajit > Version: 2.0.0~beta9+dfsg-2 > Severity: grave > Tags: upstream > > In accordance with the upstream, luajit will not be part of weezy, but rather > be made available via backports.
Sooo, how is ulatencyd affected? It just lists libluajit-5.1-dev as an
alternative build dependency of liblua5.1-0-dev (to let people rebuild the
packages with luajit support without problems) but does not actually use it. I
don't see this as a problem, am I wrong?
Cheers
--
perl -E '$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;<inidehG ordnasselA>;eg;say~~reverse'
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
