On Oct 11, Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have issued an ITP but I am still working through some review > comments on the libibverbs package. OK, if you are going to maintain the other relevant package then I can just use the name you will decide.
> However it seems strange to me for the "rdma" group to be created by > installing a separate package. What will udev do with a GROUP rule if > the libibverbs package is not installed? How will a user realize they It will use the default group (root). > need libibverbs installed to get the right ownership of the /dev files? Why should they care about devices not having the right group if they did not install the tools to use them? > Are there other debian packages that create groups as part of their install? Plently. Read the relevant parts of policy. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
