Hi, * Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-16 11:21]: > Package: mutt-ng > Version: 0.0+20050916-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi there. > > I saw that muttng is already in the experimental repository of > Debian proper and decided to try it. My first impression on it > is that it is a quite good improvement upon mutt (e.g., the name > of the variables are more consistent etc). > > Unfortunately, some tools (like reportbug, when invoked with -M) > call mutt directly and it would be nice for the system > administrators that installed muttng to be able to choose what > to use via the update-alternatives infra structure provided by > Debian. > > I would be very grateful if it were possible to use this scheme, > so that I would use muttng in more situations. > > BTW, I do see one minor problem with the naming of muttng: I see > the names mutt-ng and muttng being used without consistency in > both the sites, documentation, command line interface (the name > of the executable) etc. > > It would be nice to have a consistent naming.
Yes, I totally agree. But why is this a bug against mutt-ng? Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org Forget about that mouse with 3/4/5 buttons - gimme a keyboard with 103/104/105 keys!
pgpDPcvKo2iCh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
