On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 the mental interface of Rogério Brito told: > Package: mutt-ng > Version: 0.0+20050916-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi there. > > I am right now playing with mutt-ng directly taken from experimental and > it does seem more sensible (at least with the naming of the variables) > than mutt. > > I would, therefore, like to use it in preference of mutt, even if I have > mutt installed. Unfortunately, some programs already use mutt as a > hardcoded value (for instance, this very same bugreport tool that I am > using right now, when invoked with the -M option).
echo "mua 'muttng -H'" >> ~/.reportbugrc
> So, would it be possible to provide a way (say, via alternatives) so
> that the system administrator could choose which version to give
> preference?
No, mutt-ng is bleeding edge and isn't an altrnative yet.
> I think that using alternatives would be quite painless to implement and
> I can send a patch if desired.
>
> Oh, BTW, it seems to be mature enough to warrant a first upload to
> unstable (so that it can move to testing, where more people would use
> it).
No, mutt-ng is bleeding edge and isn't stable enough yet.
> Thanks for packaging muttng, Rogério Brito.
Thanks for reporting
Elimar
--
.~.
/V\ L I N U X
/( )\ >Phear the Penguin<
^^-^^
pgpTnrvyvSKWz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
