Hello, On 28 February 2013 13:56, Ricardo Mones <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 28 February 2013 13:39, Ricardo Mones <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> Sorry, I disagree. It's reproducible always. >> >> >> >> >> Not on other systems. That's what unreproducible means: other people >> >> >> don't see the same. Nobody says you don't have the problem or cannot >> >> >> reproduce it. >> >> >> >> > I know what unreproducible means. Probably, you didn't try hard enough >> >> > :) When I said it's reproducible here always, I meant if you try to >> >> > simulate the situation closer to mine you *will* get this. >> >> >> >> Just reproduced it with unreachable SMTP server. Raising the severity >> >> back. >> > >> > Could you detail the steps you did to reproduce that? >> >> * Make sure the server is unreachable, for example by this: ip route >> add smtp-server dev lo >> * Compose new message and try to send it. >> * Wait for the timeout. >> * Observe the error message. >> * Try re-sending it. >> * It fails.
> So you're trying to re-send without making the server reachable again > and expect it to succeed? Is this a joke? :-P Erm, it seems like you're joking. Of course I meant it's reachable again, but, well, either I have it reachable or not, Claws *must* try to deliver it, and it doesn't, and the network log shows, and the message I get confirms that. Do you really want me to dig into the code? If I was you I'd not dare to let me do that :D -- WBR, Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
