Hi, On 08.05.2013 14:16, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > My suggestion is no not consider bandwidthd a blocker for apache2.4, > since it's really not given that serving the generated graphs is > really wanted/needed. (Personally I point my web browser towards > file:///var/lib/bandwidthd/htdocs/ instead of http://localhost/bandwidthd/ > when I want to look at my graphs, and the former is completely > "webserver-agnostic". ;P)
It's not, don't worry. Hence your bug is not filed as serious either. I just want you to be aware that the migration to 2.4 involves a few changes as denoted by us. Everything else should be fine for web applications, apart that you cannot really test most of them until we have a reasonable stack (e.g. Apache + PHP + wsgi et. al.) available for web application packagers to test. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
