Are thinking about backporting it? My production system is running still 1.x
Greetings, Willem On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 13:39 +0100, Chris Boot wrote: > On 23/05/2013 14:23, Maykel Moya wrote: > > El 23/05/13 07:57, W. van den Akker escribió: > > > >> Any progress in this? I like to see v2.0 into debian due to ipv6 > >> logging capabilities. > > > > Thanks to nice work by Chris Boot ulogd2 finally entered sid[1]. > > See the ITP[2] for further info. > > > > Regards, maykel > > > > [1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/ulogd2 [2] > > http://bugs.debian.org/502305 > > > > Hi folks, > > Indeed, I have uploaded my ulogd2 package. It would be great if you > could have a look and let me know your comments. One of the reasons I > did it as a new package was because I simply couldn't see a way of > converting the configuration between ulogd-1.x and ulogd-2.x at all; > they are very different programs indeed. > > Now that ulogd-1.x is end-of-life ("All production systems should > migrate to the stable series ulogd-2.x as soon as possible as we do > not plan to make more 1.x releases."[1]), I'd like to suggest making > the ulogd package transitional. Do you support this suggestion? > > Laszlo: I'd be happy to adopt ulogd to do the transition if you would > like. > > Best regards, > Chris > > [1] http://netfilter.org/projects/ulogd/index.html >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
