hi, On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Roland Stigge <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is also caused by a temporary openjdk-7 FTBFS issue (openjdk-7 buil > before on powerpcspe), which I'm working on separately. > > However, the patch that I proposed in #702180 wasn't applied correctly. > Only some hunks were applied. Others not, and in one case, "powerpc" was > accidentally _changed_ to "powerpcspe" which is actually an issue on > powerpc now. > I'm attaching a new incremental patch for hyperestraier 1.4.13-10 which > fixes this. > Thank you, I will apply new one...orz > Further, I don't think that the powerpcspe exception you put into > JAVA_UNSUPPORTED_CPUS (debian/rules) is necessary, because java is > supposed to work fine on powerpcspe (consider the issue I described > above as only temporary). > This was intensionally set, because this upload included another change (jdk migration from 6 to 7), and when I checked powerpcspe's status, it didn't have openjdk7 yet. I'm unsure which is better to enable java binding or not. Is your separate work (to fix openjdk7 FTBFS) expected to finish soon? regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru
