Hi, On 06/20/2013 09:34 AM, Satoru KURASHIKI wrote: >> Further, I don't think that the powerpcspe exception you put into >> JAVA_UNSUPPORTED_CPUS (debian/rules) is necessary, because java is >> supposed to work fine on powerpcspe (consider the issue I described >> above as only temporary). > > This was intensionally set, because this upload included another change > (jdk migration from 6 to 7), and when I checked powerpcspe's status, > it didn't have openjdk7 yet. > > I'm unsure which is better to enable java binding or not. Is your separate > work > (to fix openjdk7 FTBFS) expected to finish soon?
You don't need to worry about the state of openjdk-7 on powerpcspe. As long as openjdk-7 is _intended_ to work on powerpcspe (via Architecture: etc.) openjdk-7 is already fixed for powerpcspe at debian-ports.org, see also: http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-ports/pool-powerpcspe/main/o/openjdk-7/ The respective openjdk-7 bug #712686 is still open, but I built and integrated the fix already at debian-ports.org so openjdk-7 is already useable. I actually even integrated the fix for #702180 at debian-ports.org, see http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-ports/pool-powerpcspe/main/h/hyperestraier/ So please just enable it as done on powerpc as long as I don't tell otherwise. Thanks in advance, Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
