Hi, the patch looks ok to me from a cursory glance, see comments inline
Am 24.08.2013 17:42, schrieb Andrey Jr. Melnikov:
>
> +/* ---------------------- exfat -------------------- */
> +
> +static const gchar *exfat_defaults[] = { "uid=", "gid=", "iocharset=utf8",
> "namecase=0", "errors=remount-ro", "umask=0022", NULL };
using umask=0022 looks inconsistent what we use for other file systems,
ntfs uses "dmask=0077", "fmask=0177", vfat "dmask=0077"
Martin, any comments?
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
