2013/9/1 Michael Biebl <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > the patch looks ok to me from a cursory glance, see comments inline > > Am 24.08.2013 17:42, schrieb Andrey Jr. Melnikov: >> >> +/* ---------------------- exfat -------------------- */ >> + >> +static const gchar *exfat_defaults[] = { "uid=", "gid=", "iocharset=utf8", >> "namecase=0", "errors=remount-ro", "umask=0022", NULL }; > > using umask=0022 looks inconsistent what we use for other file systems, > ntfs uses "dmask=0077", "fmask=0177", vfat "dmask=0077" No problem for both modules (fuse/non-fuse) to use dmask=0077, fmask=0177. Regenerate patch?
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
