On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:25:24PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:38:51PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On the other hand we've managed to survive for quite a few releases with > > this; it's a straightforward set of leaf packages after all. > I was hoping you were planning to do a better job than the previous > maintainer. > This bug is #341005 which was closed by the package removal. > There is no reason for xemacs21-support to depend on xemacs21 since xemacs21 > is a dummy package. Note that I updated the severity of the bug rather than closing it - it seems like at most a normal severity bug unless it actually causes problems.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
