On 18/02/2014 14:17, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 13:34:47 +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>
>> So, do you think we can close this bug? Else, what is your
>> precise problem?
>>
> As far as I can tell from the few packages I looked at with wrong
> dependencies, it appears they were built with ocl-icd 1.3-3. The
> current symbols file does appear to be reasonable (I'm not completely
> sure about the presence of #MINVER# together with virtual packages, but
> that's rather minor compared to the previous state of generating purely
> virtual dependencies).
It has no influence as ocl-icd-libopencl1 provides the alternative
virtual package. So, it is purely cosmetic. I can remove it if you
think it is better (note that #MINVER# applies to the real package
#PACKAGE# (ie ocl-icd-libopencl1), not to the libopencl1 virtual
package).
> I guess we'll just have to rebuild the rdeps to
> get rid of the wrong libopencl1 deps.
The bug with old ocl-icd, as consequence, only forbid installation
of non-free libopencl (only ocl-icd-libopencl1 can be installed to
satisfy the generated dependencies). That's why I did not yet ask
for rebuild of reverse dependencies. "Normal" upload of OpenCL
program should fix this quickly enough.
Regards,
Vincent
> Cheers,
> Julien
>
--
Vincent Danjean Adresse: Laboratoire LIG - Bât. INRIA Rhône-Alpes
Téléphone: +33 4 76 61 55 10 655 avenue de l'Europe
Fax: +33 4 76 61 52 52 Montbonnot Saint Martin
Email: [email protected] 38334 Saint-Ismier cedex
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
