On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:47:14AM +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote: > It's a backported package, so the bug hardly deserves to be important.
No problem, but i chose this severity from variants reportbug offered to me. Since i can't use erlang-common-test package with this bug i chose: > 4 important a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a > package, without > rendering it completely unusable to everyone. This is not seems to be a cosmetic error: > 7 minor things like spelling mistakes and other minor cosmetic > errors that do not > affect the core functionality of the package. > Yes, this was the bug which is already fixed in unstable and testing. > I'll upload the fix to backports shortly. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
