Bill Allombert <ballo...@debian.org> writes: > Hello Gabriele, > emacs24 has 50% more dependencies than emacs23, thus this is not very > attractive.
> Personnaly I would rather convert the two remaining .org files to SGML > so we do not need to build-depend on emacs at all. > But other policy maintainer probably disagree. Personally, I have no particular attachment to using org-mode to maintain that documentation. I think both of those documents are in the wiki; I don't recall whether we moved them there from the package or the other way around. Having them in some form of SGML would be fine with me. > Maybe we could use emacs24-nox|emacs24 instead ? Yes, if we keep them, this would be a good idea. No need to install all the X stuff during the build. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org