On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:59:40AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Bill Allombert <ballo...@debian.org> writes: > > > Hello Gabriele, > > emacs24 has 50% more dependencies than emacs23, thus this is not very > > attractive. > > > Personnaly I would rather convert the two remaining .org files to SGML > > so we do not need to build-depend on emacs at all. > > But other policy maintainer probably disagree. > > Personally, I have no particular attachment to using org-mode to maintain > that documentation. I think both of those documents are in the wiki; I > don't recall whether we moved them there from the package or the other way > around. Having them in some form of SGML would be fine with me. > > > Maybe we could use emacs24-nox|emacs24 instead ? > > Yes, if we keep them, this would be a good idea. No need to install all > the X stuff during the build.
Done, without prejudice of rewriting README and Process in SGML later. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
