On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 the mental interface of Gerhard Brauer told: [...] > Hello, > > mutt-ng (and mutt) has a nice (patched?) feature to do a correct > List reply even the mailbox is not defined as "list" or subscribe > by looking at relevant header vars.
Wrong! Lists have to be defined in lists or subscribe.
> On my backported mutt-ng on sarge there is a inconsistency when i
> use the maildir header cache. As a example:
>
> I delete the header cache for debian-user-german mailbox. Then i
> start mutt-ng, go to this mailbox. Pressing <L> does a correct
> list reply to the list. When now switch to a other list (or close
> muttng) and come back (and the header cache does it work) then
> List reply (<L>) doesn't work anymore, it says (similar): Not a
> mailing list.
Maybe 'cause the list isn't defined neither in lists nor in
subscribe? In lists you have to define mailling-lists you're reading
but not subscribed. In subscribed you have to define mailling-lists
you're subscribed to.
> This could be reproduced here. If i use mutt instead (which has
> the similar feature) then it works, e.g. also if the mutt header
> cache would be used.
I can reproduce this as well. So maybe the bug should be that
mutt-ng should _not_ have to do a list-reply on lists which are
_not_ defined in lists or subscribe. This looks more logical, isn't
it?
> I dont't see any parameter which will correct this behavior (only
> using maildir_header_cache_verify=yes correct the error, but with
> this it's obsolet to use a header cache). header_cache_compress is
> set to yes.
As a workaround define your lists/subscibed.
Elimar
--
.~.
/V\ L I N U X
/( )\ >Phear the Penguin<
^^-^^
pgpxlcEbmwvrB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
