Hello!
For the record once more, I'm quoting this from a private discussion
with Adam Conrad after poking him about review progress....
-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----
Day changed to 20 jul 2014
21:33 <infinity> Jesus, looking at the timestamps in this query backscroll,
I've obviously dropped the ball again. I'll try harder to
attack it over the next day or two, but if I don't get to it,
consider this my blessing to add yourself to Uploaders in your
branch (if not already done), and upload to experimental by,
say, Tuesday?
21:34 <infinity> I've been swamped at work, and clearly haven't had the time to
make this the priority it should be.
21:34 <infinity> Based on the little bit I have looked at, I have no issues
with you having autonomy here, or forcing you to gate
everything through a level of team review.
21:35 <infinity> (Though, it's a package that clearly needs more than one set
of eyes regardless)
Day changed to 21 jul 2014
11:12 <ah> I don't think we should worry too much about stuff targeted at
experimental... hopefully you'll find the needed time to review it
before I'm ready to say that I want to target unstable.
-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----8<-----
I'm thus considering the NAK for experimental upload revoked and will
follow up with an upload targeted at experimental soon.
(I expect this upload will be followed up by one or more additional
uploads to experimental before the package is in shape for potentially
uploading it to unstable. There are currently no time estimates for
how long this will take. It will likely very much depend on how much
people help out with testing the new version to prevent/detect any
major regressions.)
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
