>>>>> Anton Zinoviev <an...@lml.bas.bg> writes: >>>>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 03:44:47PM +0000, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
[…] >> Please provide 256-glyph fonts with both Cyrillic and Esperanto >> glyphs (specifically: U+0108, U+0109, U+011C, U+011D, U+0124, >> U+0125, U+0134, U+0135, U+015C, U+015D, U+016C, U+016D.) >> One possible such fontset is MIMEd. It is based on CyrSlav.256, and >> retains all its glyphs within the U+04xx range, adds the >> aforementioned Esperanto glyphs, U+00F7 DIVISION SIGN, while >> removing certain U+20xx (U+2013, U+2020, U+2021, U+2030, U+2039, >> U+203A) glyphs, and U+2122 TRADE MARK SIGN, arguably not all that >> valuable for Cyrillic-based typography. > Hi and thank you for your contribution! > I am tagging this bug report as 'wontfix' for the following reasons: > 1. The combination Cyrillic + Esperanto is supported by Uni2 and Uni3 > fontsets. … However, these fontsets come at the price of the reduced color capability for the text terminals. > 2. Small fontsets (256 glyphs) are for one language only. That’s hardly the case; for instance, how do you explain that the CyrSlav fontset includes ñ? Is it used in any languages that rely on the Cyrillic script? > Users who need multilingual support should use Uni1, Uni2 or Uni3. FWIW, I’d gladly accept a facility allowing the user to use custom fontsets for a fix to this issue. -- FSF associate member #7257 http://boycottsystemd.org/ … 3013 B6A0 230E 334A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org