Hi again, I have noticed some changes of yours in SVN but I can not yet build the package. Just in case you are not aware of this.
Kind regards Andreas. On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 03:24:37PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Ivo, > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 03:11:02PM +0200, Ivo Maintz wrote: > > > We somehow need to set a deadline for this to finish which I would > > > like to see happen in beginning of September. > > > > Ok, should be enough time left. > > Well, things tend to take always more time than expected. :-) > > > > I appended a '--compression xz' since also this has changed. Now a > > > properly xz compressed source tarball will be created. > > > > > > Unfortunately I was again unable to build the package in an unstable > > > chroot. Could you please be more specific about this "works for me"? > > > Can you confirm that the package builds via pbuilder? > > > > I use debuild and sbuild. > > But in sbuild It seems, that _before_ starting the the build, a last > > time "debian/rules clean" is executed - without applying the patches. > > Normally, this is no problem, but in libsbml "clean" means "delete > > everything and unpack the sources". This behavior is changed, not > > shure, around april/may?. Maybe, in pbuilder we have the same? > > I think sbuild is doing in principle the same as pbuilder: Just create > a minimalistic chroot and build there. So I expect the same behaviour > and if you get the package building using sbuild that's perfectly OK. > > > I just found another solution: in debian/sources/options I can set > > ignores for changed files, and I'll try to find all during the > > build created and changed files. > > Sounds reasonable. > > > > Currently this is no difference to the version in SVN for me. :-( > > > > uscan --verbose --no-download > > [...] > > Newest version on remote site is 5.10.2+dfsg, local version is > > 5.10.0+dfsg => Newer version available from > > > > https://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/sbml/libSBML-5.10.2-core-plus-packages-src.zip > > -- Scan finished > > > > Anyway, I'll focus on 5.10.0 first. > > That's perfectly fine for the moment. Just lets any version fixing the > currently open RC bug migrate to testing - afterwards we have time to > hunt behind the latest upstream version. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > _______________________________________________ > Debian-med-packaging mailing list > debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging > -- http://fam-tille.de
libsbml_5.10.0+dfsg-1_amd64.build.bz2
Description: Binary data