On 09/10/2014 18:29, Wookey wrote: > +++ Sylvestre Ledru [2014-10-09 17:20 +0200]: >> On 09/10/2014 17:15, Wookey wrote: >>> +++ Renato Golin [2014-10-09 15:55 +0100]: >>>> Release 3.4 had the old AArch64 back-end that is now deprecated and >>>> removed. I wouldn't bother with that, as it could bring a lot of >>>> incompatibility issues between 3.4 and 3.5. >>>> >>>> For all purposes, AArch64 support in LLVM begins with 3.5. >>> OK, in that case can we just mark 3.3 and 3.4 as 'not built on arm64'? >>> I assume nothing build-deps on them. Sylvestre? >>> >> Actually, it was already disabled. Just a temp directory to create to >> make dh_install happy > I think we are talking at cross-purposes here. You are talking about > the debugger, I am talking about the whole package. If 3.4 is best not > used on arm64, then why are we building it at all on this > arch. Because cross-compilers (i.e used of 3.4 but other back-ends)? > Because build-deps? > > Similar questions for 3.3. > OK. My bad :)
I don't have any opinion on this. I am not restricting the arch in the packaging. But you have to know that there are packages explicitly depending on 3.4 (ghc for example). About 3.3, see bug 753965 Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
