Am Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 06:31:54PM +0100 schrieb Yury V. Zaytsev: > On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 17:58 +0100, Wilfried Klaebe wrote: > > > > How hard would it be to change the code to try to dlopen() the > > necessary libs on demand? > > Well, I don't really know; I'm just trying to explain why this > dependency was added to the package in the first place.
I understood that, and I wouldn't want that (or any) feature gone just because I don't need it. > If you'd like to convert it to dlopen() similar to how support for X.Org > is implemented, this dependency can certainly be dropped, but I'm not > sure if this feature is worth the effort... I have looked into the sources and not yet found out how it's done there. Actually, I'm not even sure I found the right feature yet. All I do know is there is no direct occurrence of "dlopen" in the sources. As I find time, I might look into it more. If anyone else wants to have a go, I won't be unhappy either. Neither would I be about a decision to drop this feature, although I might be happier about it being extended to other filesystems as well (with the necessary libs being dlopen()ed on demand). Regards, Wilfried -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
