On Dec 14, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Under devfs, cciss devices are named /dev/cciss/disc, /dev/cciss/part0, > etc. > > Under udev with devfs emulation using devfs.rules, the devices are named > /dev/cciss/c0d0, /dev/cciss/c0d0p1, etc. IIRC 2.4 kernels used c0d0p1 and 2.6 kernels used the other format or something like this, so who initially contributed the script choose the old format since it would be more compatible. As an extra data point, I have a SuSE system installed a few years ago with static c0d0p1-like devices.
Does d-i really really need another script to generate disc/part devices? They are hard to manage (creation requires locking) and I'd rather not spend time trying to support an highly deprecated interfaces. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
