On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > But what I wanted to say is just thanks for maintaining and use whatever > > means you find most comfortable for you -- My cry was out of the > > moment of weakness I guess ;)
> Don't worry, no offense taken. What does concern me is that, despite > claiming to be ABI-compatible with previous 1.3.x releases by default, > 1.3.3 omits some symbols that they defined. (I guess FLTK's developers > consider it sufficient to preserve class and virtual table layouts.) > As such, I'm tempted to go ahead and activate assorted new features that > are disabled by default to avoid totally breaking ABI compatibility, as > described at http://www.fltk.org/cmp.php#FLTK_ABI_VERSION. I would then > of course rename the runtime library packages accordingly, calling for a > trip through NEW. or we could check if may be none of rdepends use any of those (and their rebuild might be the only thing needed to stay safe)? I could run quickly rebuild of all build/rdepends if you gimme perspective package which doesn't even bring up the dead things alive? ;) -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D. http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org Research Scientist, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept. Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
