Hi Jack, where do you see that musescore 2.0.2 depends on soundfont? It
does not. However, this info is a bit confusing in
https://packages.debian.org/sid/musescore. There you'll see that it's
listed as "[alpha, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, m68k, powerpcspe,
sh4]", that means: only in archs where we still have musescore 1.x., and
not 2.x.
By the way, timgm6mb-soundfont has been accepted and I've fixed in 2.0.2
the only serious bug which could block the package from going to
testing.
So, in a few days we'll have musescore 2.0.2 in testing, hopefully.
I'll be closing this bug. It seems we agreed to not change the soundfont
package names for now, and the current discussion is valid, but not
really related to it.
Bests and thanks for your time on this,
--
tiago
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
