Le samedi, 15 août 2015, 15.57:38 Jakub Wilk a écrit : > I added license information for libgs.so.9: > https://bitbucket.org/jwilk/adequate/commits/41726eb0cf64
Great, thanks. > There's no version check at the moment. I might add it later. (IMHO > changing license to a more restrictive one is an ABI breakage that > should warrant SONAME change. I'm somewhat tempted to file an RC bug > against Ghostscript.) Feel free to do, as we should probably have that disucssion with Ghostscript's primary maintainer. :) > >As far as I understand it, it is forbidden for any GPLv2only to link > >against AGPL libgs9, > > This is my understanding, too. > > Are you aware of any such license conflicts in the archive? No, not really, but it's something I was afraid of with the license change. It's probably just bound to happen, especially with non-direct linking. Cheers, OdyX
