Le dimanche 01 janvier 2006 à 22:20 +0100, Loïc Minier a écrit : > On Sun, Jan 01, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > I don't think there is a "good" way of solving this issue. Maybe a new > > "gnome-www-browser" alternative? > > If the issue is merely between GNOME and non-GNOME browsers, maybe it's > possible to extend the current sensible-browser algorithm to check for > GNOME too. > > Right now, sensible-browsers checks the list in $BROWSER, then tries > x-www-browser if $DISPLAY is set, and finally launches www-browser. > > We could request for it to check for GNOME and try a list of browsers > or a gnome-browser alternative indeed.
In which case we can simply ship a gnome-www-browser script like the gnome-wm script we already have. It would try epiphany, then fall back to galeon, then to firefox, then to sensible-browser. Regards, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
