On 01/10/15 20:47, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 01-10-15 20:24, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 10/08/15 10:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> On 01-07-15 16:39, Matthias Klose wrote: >>>> The gfortran module version 14 is triggered by making gfortran-5 the >>>> default >>>> gfortran (which should happen at the same time as the C/C++ default >>>> switch). >>>> >>>> It affects all packages depending on gfortran modules, the previous >>>> transition >>>> tracker bug https://bugs.debian.org/746805 has a list of packages, which >>>> probably need some updates. >>> >>> Please see the thread on debian-release@ about the collision with the >>> netcdf transition: >>> >>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2015/08/msg00247.html >> >> Are you still waiting for an ack on this, or did this start already? Can you >> give a status update? > > The netcdf transition completed some time ago, I started it without > getting a go-ahead or other feedback from the Release Team because I was > fed up with waiting for the requested feedback and wanted to get it out > of the way to unblock the gfortran transition, and it subsequently > unblocked various transitions for the Debian GIS team by trigging the > gdal transition. > > While I haven't followed the gfortan module transition progress, I think > that's also done by now.
Have all the packages that ship .mod files been rebuilt? Emilio
