On 12/20/2015 01:21 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > needs a lot of work != someone is doing a lot of work on it. So unless someone > is and you didn't say it, or you are volunteering to do it, I'm not sure how > the > situation is going to improve.
Well, the person who made the change which broke ghc on armel said that and I assume he is working on it in the future. His change, on the other hand, improved ghc on armhf. So nothing is saying he is not improved ghc on armel, too. I don't understand the point of your message. I know that someone has to do the work and I myself have already done a lot of work, too, not just ghc. The message from the ghc is simply "we know it's broken and we're going to fix it", that's all. I assume ghc upstream development hasn't stopped, has it? Or what exactly did you try to convey here? Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913