On 20/12/15 14:02, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 12/20/2015 01:42 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> I know nothing about haskell upstream, so the fact that armel got broken for >> so >> long even though it was pointed out by Joachim in several mails made me think >> that arm(el) development had indeed been stopped. > > Sorry, but this is complete non-sense.
Cool. So now worrying about the situation and long-term status of a key package in a release architecture is called nonsense. Way to go. Emilio
