On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 07:51:59PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ..... > > The documentation is maintained in the autoconf-doc package in > non-free by Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. If you > are really reporting a documentation bug (I am not sure about > this) then you should report it against autoconf-doc. > A related bug is already filed as #298504.
yes the bug 298504 says a similar thing but mine is not a documentation bug. > I think that you may be saying > that it is a bug that AC_PATH_XTRA does not try to compile and > link when it finds that /usr/include/X11/Xos.h exists. Is that > the bug that you are reporting? yes . It is due to macro _AC_PATH_X_XMKMF and AC_PATH_X suffers the same problem (I just checked) > > Ps: X11/Intrinsic.h is never ever checked anywhere : > > $ grep Intrinsic.h -r /usr/share/a* x-test/ > > does not report anything > > The documentation is wrong. Here is what the relevant changelog > entry says: > > * AC_PATH_X now checks for X11/Xlib.h and XrmInitialize (X proper) > rather than X11/Intrinsic.h and XtMalloc (Xt). Thanks to Kurt Roeckx, > Thomas Dickey, and Paul Eggert. Closes: #327655. OK, let us assume that the documentation says that Then my bug says: no, AC_PATH_X does not check X11/Xlib.h and XrmInitialize a. -- Andrea Mennucc "Ukn ow,Ifina llyfixe dmysp acebar.ohwh atthef" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
