On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Vincent Fourmond <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Ross Gammon <[email protected]> wrote: >>Whilst debugging the two desktop menu items in imagemagick (separate bug), it >> was noticed that the two packages (imagemagick & imagemagick-6.q16) seem to >> provide the same binary, despite the q16 package being advertised as having a >> different quantum depth (16 v 8). > > Hmmm. Is it still written somewhere that the default depth is 8 ? If > yes, then clearly we should modify that. > >> Also, if offering a default quantum depth package, and one with more quantum >> depth, would it be better to offer Q16 as the default, and Q32 as the option? > > That is something we'd like to do, and it's the reason why we set up > different packages with proper alternatives, but that's unfortunately > not going to happen very soon.
i am returning from paternity leave and try to upload a fixed experimental package. After I will do a HDRI imagemagick version Bastien > > Best, > > Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-gmagick-im-team mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gmagick-im-team
