On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 08:12:53PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 04/19/2016 02:20 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Severity: important
> 
> sorry, I disagree. wishlist sounds correct for me, but I guess we can
> stick with normal.

whatever, tbh I just copied the header from a random bug about a hurd
ftbfs, there somebody used important and I stick with it.  Anyway, I'm
the kind of person that (unless when dealing with a great number of
bugs) just sees RC vs non-RC, so whatever you find appropriate is fine :)

> > Tags: patch upstream
> 
> why did you tag it upstream?

"This bug applies to the upstream part of the package" (from the tag
description).  Is there something wrong with it?

> I've commited your patch at upstream.

Thanks! :)

I'd really love if you could also upload the fix to debian, as the hurd
binaries from this package currently depends on libpng12, and we're
trying to ditch it; it would be nice if we could avoid forcefully
removing the package by breaking binaries when not neccessary.

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to