Source: debtags
Severity: wishlist

Hi!
I see that, among the implemented-in:: tags, we lack one for assembly.
It can't be called a rare or esoteric language, although it's quite special:
it's an umbrella term for a separate language for every arch, and it's almost
always used in conjunction with some other language.

While packages written entirely in assembly are, to put it mildly, rare,
there's a lot which have substantial assembly parts.

The tag would be especially worthy for packages that do require specific
assembly support for each new arch.

Reply via email to