On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 04:59:07AM +0000, Craig Small wrote: > Hi Josh, > Thanks for looking into this, I only do some simple use of watch so don't > see the problems. I agree, if it doesn't understand something then stop > messing around and drop out. > > Patch 0001 was already fixed upstream commit 6fcb6900 has a similar fix > The other three patches have been applied upstream.
Thanks! It looks like the handling for \e[m still has a bug in it, as it has a condition for that both before and after the loop. The one after the loop looks wrong; I think the one before the loop is the only one that makes sense. - Josh Triplett
