On 07/16/2016 03:43 AM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On viernes, 15 de julio de 2016 10:36:27 P. M. ART Lisandro Damián Nicanor > Pérez Meyer wrote: > [snip] >> I really *love* them (I haven't used cme before, someday I'll need to >> investigate that one). Sadly I think applying them without the maintainer's >> approval it's a bad idea. > > It is worth to note here that the last upload was marked as "Team upload" > because it was prepared by Gudjon and I while we where working towards pushin > qwt with qt5 support to unstable and I just coordinated with Gudjon to do the > upload. > > I'm really not too interested in maintaining qwt myself, I just happen to > have > another package that requires it too.
I'd like to see qwt properly team maintained, preferably within an existing team (Debian Science seems a good candidate) instead of using a single individual as Maintainer. If that move it accompanied by the switch to git, I'm willing to be move structurally involved in qwt packaging because it's an important dependency of one of my packages too, although I also don't want to be the sole maintainer. Gudjon, please consider a more formal team structure for the maintenance of the qwt package. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
