I demand that Laszlo Boszormenyi may or may not have written... > On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 20:54 +0000, Darren Salt wrote: [snip] >> If you want to mark this as "done", you should NMU it (but check with >> Siggi);
> I have asked Siggi about NMU 0.5.3, he gave me ACK. This is good. >> my repository contains a packaged version of the current release. > Then maybe you should NMU 0.5.3? That will need sponsorship. A lot has changed since 0.4.8; I've created a package "gxineplugin" to avoid conflicts with other browser plugins just by installing gxine. [snip] >> If you meant to close one of the gxine bugs which are tagged >> "unreproducible", you'll find that I won't argue :-) > My mistake. I meant #260730 and not this. Forgive me. That one should probably be closed, yes. > But the question remains. Do you NMU 0.5.3 or I should do it, Siggi already > gave me an ACK, which is an ACK for you as well. Or 0.5.4, which is not far from being ready for release (I have one or two bug reports to investigate). If you think that 0.5.3 should be uploaded anyway, then the package in my repository (URL in .sig) should be used, but the "ack NMUs" line will need to be removed from the changelog since it's not appropriate for an NMU. This is a trivial exercise and is left for the uploader. :-) -- | Darren Salt | linux (or ds) at | nr. Ashington, | sarge, | youmustbejoking | Northumberland | RISC OS | demon co uk | Toon Army | <URL:http://www.youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk/progs.sid.html> Fax me no questions, I'll fax you no lies! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
