On Wed, 7 Sep 2016, Markus Koschany wrote: > But what about packages that > neither fail there nor locally in a clean cowbuilder environment but > under some obscure circumstances in a local sbuild environment?
Excuse me? A chroot without gnupg is now called "obscure circumstances in a local sbuild environment"? I find such expression sligthly offensive and unrespectful, even more than raising once the severity of the bug to match current practice (with a reminder of what current practice is). I said the way to reproduce it from the very beginning: A chroot without gnupg. The patch clearly added gnupg to build-depends. The error message said 'Cannot run program "gpg"'. But now this is "obscure circumstances", as if I had not given enough information to reproduce the bug. The only thing I didn't do was to attach a full build log, because I naively thought that the error message, the patch, the bug title and the explanation was more than enough to reproduce the bug. Why you apparently refused to use all this information when trying to reproduce the bug is still a mystery to me.
