On Wed, 7 Sep 2016, Markus Koschany wrote: > Now we all agree that a package that fails to build > on the official buildd network is RC buggy. But what about packages that > neither fail there nor locally in a clean cowbuilder environment but > under some obscure circumstances in a local sbuild environment?
For the record: This is a false dichotomy, because xmlgraphics-commons didn't fail in the official buildds. it didn't fail in a what-you-call-clean-but-it-was-not-really-clean cowbuilder environment, but the circumstances in which it failed were not obscrure at all (as explained). It seems to me that you are looking for a generic passport to downgrade FTBFS bugs. Please don't put policy violations and bugs that we still don't know how to reproduce in the same bag. Thanks.
