Le samedi 17 septembre 2016, 17:28:03 CEST Mattia Rizzolo a écrit : > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 06:23:19PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: > > > I recall you were saying something about this aiming to experimental, > > > because some SONAME changed (I didn't really checkout), which must also > > > be the reason you're asking for sponsorship (=> the package will go > > > through NEW, so you can't upload yourself). But your upload is > > > targetting unstable. > > > > Corrected > > That means you're going to start a transition. I won't help you with > that unless you get an ACK from the release team, which afaik you > haven't.
Yes what why I have set experimental as distrib. I am wiaiting for release team. When ligh will be green I will reupload to unstable (I could do this myself because I am a DM). WIll open a bug for release team > > > > Things I want to see fixed: > > > > > > 1/ you didn't incorporate any NMU > > > > Change included and NMU aknowledge. This version go back before the NMU > > you don't need anymore (since a decade…) to reclose the bugs if you're > including the old changelog entries. Removed > > > > 2/ the Vcs-* field, Vcs-Git is plain broken. > > > > Done > > not in git. Pushed > > > > Other things that you may consider changes in future, not needed now: > Great that you did most of them, but you didn't push (at least not to > debian/6.9.5.9+dfsg-1) > > > Now building will remove package from mentors and uploading a new one > > no need if you push to git. pushed
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
