Hello!

Thanks for reporting. I've CC'd Vicențiu Ciorbaru, a MariaDB core
developer, who hopefully can review this.


2016-09-22 12:42 GMT+03:00 James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org>:
> Source: mariadb-10.0
> Version: 10.0.27-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> Currently mariadb-10.0 FTBFS on mips64el due to various testsuite
> failures. The two attached patches should resolve this. I am also
> looking at the failures on mips and mipsel, but haven't finished fixing
> those yet.
>
> mips-errno-enotempty.patch
> On mips* architectures, ENOTEMPTY == 93 which wasn't handled by two test
> cases.
>
> mips64-taocrypt-integer.patch
> The previous patch to fix mips64el made the package build, but was
> unfortunately completely wrong. I've replaced the code with a generic
> implementation using GCC's __int128. It could probably be generalized to
> other arches, but I didn't want to break anything.
>
> Thanks,
> James



-- 
Otto Kekäläinen
https://keybase.io/ottok
Seravo Oy and MariaDB Foundation

Reply via email to