Hi all,

On 22/09/16 10:48, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> Thanks for reporting. I've CC'd Vicențiu Ciorbaru, a MariaDB core
> developer, who hopefully can review this.

It would be good if this bug could be fixed soon (if only in Debian).
The release team has indicated that this bug blocks mips64el from being
a release arch for stretch (as it currently has no
default-libmysqlclient-dev implementation).

Thanks,
James

> 2016-09-22 12:42 GMT+03:00 James Cowgill <[email protected]>:
>> Source: mariadb-10.0
>> Version: 10.0.27-1
>> Severity: important
>> Tags: patch
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently mariadb-10.0 FTBFS on mips64el due to various testsuite
>> failures. The two attached patches should resolve this. I am also
>> looking at the failures on mips and mipsel, but haven't finished fixing
>> those yet.
>>
>> mips-errno-enotempty.patch
>> On mips* architectures, ENOTEMPTY == 93 which wasn't handled by two test
>> cases.
>>
>> mips64-taocrypt-integer.patch
>> The previous patch to fix mips64el made the package build, but was
>> unfortunately completely wrong. I've replaced the code with a generic
>> implementation using GCC's __int128. It could probably be generalized to
>> other arches, but I didn't want to break anything.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> James

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to