On 01.12.2016 22:38, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2016, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > >> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016, Matthias Klose wrote: >> >>> - please could you reduce the test case to just run the failing test? >> >> I’ll try… > > OK. I’ve got it cut down, both regular and preprocessed > versions are attached. > > If I comment out either bd_empty or bd_random in… > > DO_TEST (bd_empty, test_required_bytes_empty); > DO_TEST (bd_hello, test_required_bytes_hello); > DO_TEST (bd_random, test_required_bytes_random); > > … the tests also pass, so this appears to be the minimum, > despite bd_hello being the aborting one.
cool, thanks! bonus questions: - does the test pass with -O1, if yes can you identify the -O2 -fno-* flag? - do the above with -O0 - do you get warnings when you run the test with the address and undefined sanitizers? Matthias
