Hi Sam, On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 10:28:46AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > For what it's worth, I think the policy question here is not a > significant one. > > Holger is right that we should either fix policy or fix both > (tasksel-data and blends-tasks). > I think that is a bug that should get hashed out. I don't think it is > all that timely, and I don't think it matters much how we handle things. > It seems clear that if we want the data available for tasksel, then when > tasksel runs, both tasksel-data and blends-tasks need to be installed. > How to align policy and implementation is something we should eventually > figure out.
Thanks for confirming that. So in this bug we are rather discussing the second point of my remark[1]. > I think the far more important question is whether the presentation of > blends is what our users need. Yes. I think I made my point clear about this and you also know that I'm quite biased here - so no additional comments. :-) Thanks to all CTTE members for their work Andreas. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846002#169 -- http://fam-tille.de