On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 09:22:57PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 18. Januar 2017, 20:05:06 CET schrieb Marc Haber: > > Is it worth keeping this open? Does the issue still show? Should the > > bug be retitled to reflect that we're facing a kernel issue? Should > > there be language in debian/NEWS to explain this? > > > > Do you have an opinion? > > Well I opened both a Debian kernel bug report as well as an upstream bug > report about it. The NEWS file already mentions these, mentioning the > upstream > bug reports, but it does not mention the Debian kernel bug reports. > > Bug#848682: process accounting sometimes does not work > > Bug#848683: Process accounting: Using the NETLINK inface, the command > TASKSTATS_CMD_GET returns -EINVAL > > I think it may make sense to mention these with links in NEWS file and then > say > that everything that could be done within atop and… within atop debian > package > has been done and it really needs a fix for the kernel to move forward. Cause > thats how it is, Gerlof added workarounds, the NEWS file explains the > situation, nothing that can be done within Debian atop package anymore I´d > say. I would close the bug report with that upload then.
Done. > Only caveat then would be: We wouldn´t have a reminder to check back on the > kernel issue within atop debian package realm anymore. I can live with that and hope that we won't get too many dupes. Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421
