Hi Emilio! On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > On 19/03/17 11:17, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org <http://release.debian.org/> > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > <mailto:release.debian....@packages.debian.org> > > Usertags: unblock > > > > Please unblock package sushi. > > > > sushi 1.4.0+git20160822+dfsg-3 fixes a serious bug (#857772: FTBFS with > bash as > > /bin/sh) and contains fixes for some crashes in nigiri binary which was > not > > working anymore. > > debdiff attached. > > > > Thank you, > > Devid > > > > unblock: sushi/1.4.0+git20160822+dfsg-3 > > > > + * Fix package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-version lintian warning > + switching to debhelper 9. > > Please revert that. It's not suitable during the freeze. > > The rest of the changes look good. > > You're absolutely right, no problem. I created a new package for testing-proposed-updates, you can find attached two debdiff: sushi_1.4.0+git20160822+dfsg-2.debdiff : debdiff against -1 release (current testing) sushi_1.4.0+git20160822+dfsg-2.debdiff-against-unstable: debdiff against -3 release (current unstable), this shows reverted changes. Honestly I'm not sure if testing-proposed-updates is what you meant in your email, is this ok? Or do I have to upload a new package in unstable to revert that change? Thank you, Devid
sushi_1.4.0+git20160822+dfsg-2.debdiff
Description: Binary data
sushi_1.4.0+git20160822+dfsg-2.debdiff-against-unstable
Description: Binary data
