Hi! On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi! > > On 20/03/17 19:39, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > > Hi Emilio! > > > > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org > > <mailto:po...@debian.org>> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On 19/03/17 11:17, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > > > > > > Please unblock package sushi. > > > > > > sushi 1.4.0+git20160822+dfsg-3 fixes a serious bug (#857772: FTBFS > > with bash as > > > /bin/sh) and contains fixes for some crashes in nigiri binary which > > was not > > > working anymore. > > > debdiff attached. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Devid > > > > > > unblock: sushi/1.4.0+git20160822+dfsg-3 > > > > > > > + * Fix package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-version lintian > > warning > > + switching to debhelper 9. > > > > Please revert that. It's not suitable during the freeze. > > > > The rest of the changes look good. > > > > > > You're absolutely right, no problem. I created a new package for > > testing-proposed-updates, you can find attached two debdiff: > > sushi_1.4.0+git20160822+dfsg-2.debdiff : debdiff against -1 release (current > > testing) > > sushi_1.4.0+git20160822+dfsg-2.debdiff-against-unstable: debdiff against -3 > > release (current unstable), this shows reverted changes. > > > > Honestly I'm not sure if testing-proposed-updates is what you meant in your > > email, is this ok? Or do I have to upload a new package in unstable to > > revert > > that change? > > Sorry if that was unclear, I meant unstable. The debhelper compat bump would > be > fine in experimental or after stretch is released.
Thank you for the clarification, I uploaded a new package (1.4.0+git20160822+dfsg-4), debdiff attached, > > Thanks, > Emilio Thank you! Devid
debdiff-against-testing
Description: Binary data
debdiff-against-unstable
Description: Binary data
