Hi Julien,
Julien Cristau wrote:
> > And obviously, since "qtwebkit" and "webkit" are both mentioned
> > already, the mentioning of "webkit" does not imply any webkit fork as
> > otherwise "qtwebkit" wouldn't be in there.
>
> OK. I didn't think that list is intended as a list of source
> packages.
Ah, ok, I read it that way as qtwebkit and khtml are current source
package names.
> It does talk about browser engines instead, I believe on purpose, so it
> doesn't have to be that specific about source package names (which
> wouldn't be much help to most users anyway). Maybe we could make that
> clearer.
Yes, please.
Basically this was a question during my talk "What's new in Stretch?"
today after having copied this list from the release notes on one of
my slides.
The question came from a developer of a webkit-based web browser (Cc'ed).
> Or indeed update it to actual current source packages.
Then webkit should be removed from the list. I just noticed now that
it's no current source package name anymore. it has been removed from
unstable in 2013.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
