Hi, On 08/08/17 06:38, Bastien Roucaries wrote: > Le 7 août 2017 22:59:06 GMT+02:00, James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org> a > écrit : >> On 07/08/17 16:55, roucaries bastien wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:47 PM, <jcowg...@debian.org> wrote: >>>> Package: libmagick++-6.q16-7 >>>> Version: 8:18.104.22.168+dfsg-16 >>>> Severity: serious >>>> Tags: sid buster >>>> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org >>>> Usertags: gcc-7-op-mangling >>>> >>> >>> I need a change that break ABI, I will release a new version. Does it >>> exist in this case a short cut >> >> If you are going to rename the Debian package and trigger a package >> transition, you do not need to add any of the extra symbols/shlibs >> stuff. You should still build-depend on gcc (>= 4:7) however - I'm not >> sure if all the buildds use GCC 7 by default yet. > > Should i depends on g++7 for libmagick++-dev ?
I don't think you need to do that. Consumers of your library don't need to be running gcc-7 (it should work with gcc-6 and gcc-7). Your library does need to be built using gcc-7 so that it is compatible with both compilers. Thanks, James
Description: OpenPGP digital signature