On Wed 09 Aug 2017 at 21:18:38 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Brian Potkin <claremont...@gmail.com> [2017-08-09 19:08 +0200]:
> > Thank you for doing this. As it turns out it seems our experiences are
> > quite different.
> Indeed, and I'm providing details from my setup below.
> However, the reason it works for you and not for me is that your
> scanners are connected with USB cables and thus considerdd local,
> whereas my scanner has an IP address and is thus considered remote.
> But local_only==1 is hardcoded…
I fell into the trap of confusing a scanner on the network with a
network scanner. It wouldn't be any consolation to you that, once
I had my thinking straightened out, I reproduced the behaviour you
described. Is avoiding a 3 second delay in 'lpstat -s' worth having